CHAPTER
3
DENTOLABIAL ANALYSIS
In Tthis
chapter we will focus our attention
on the lower third of the face.: tThis is in fact the
area where the lips and teeth are to be found, the subject of this specific
part of ourthe investigation. The
face and lips together are a dynamic frame thatwhich,
constantly changesing
during speakingech
and smilinge,
givinge
a different tooth exposure each time. The systematic approach
presented here,
which is based on the evaluation of precise
parameters, allows a complete dentolabial analysis to be made
and,
helpsing
to achieve correct esthetic integration of the
prosthetic rehabilitation to be achieved.
OBJECTIVE: To guide the clinician in re--establishing a correct position of the
incisal edge, re-creating appropriate incisal and tooth lengths and adequate
harmony between the occlusal plane and the commissural line.
[End of page]
The patient’s
natural head position, a determining factor in an overall evaluation of the
face, is equally also important in
dentolabial evaluation.1, 2 This analysis is
essential for evaluating the correct ratio between the teeth and lips during
the various phases of speakingech and smilinge.
Smiling is one of the most expressive non-verbal forms of communication. It conveys a
range of emotions:, from embarrassment through happiness to
the most ecstatic joy.3, 4
Smiling is made possible because of the
muscular action not only of the lips but also of the periocular muscles.5 A natural smile,
expressing joy and spontaneity, does in fact brings certain specific faciale muscles into play, such as the zygomaticus and the lower part of the orbicularis,
which contract simultaneously to allow maximum elevation of the upper lip.6, 7 It should be noted, oin the
contrastry,
that this combined muscular action would does not take place if
we asked the patient was asked to smile non-spontaneouslyon
cue.8 In thatis case, the orbicularis would does not contract, resulting in an unnatural
mimico-facial movement.
I. [A]LIP MOVEMENT
Observation of the lip movements allows us to evaluation ofe the dental exposure during the various
phases of speakingech and smiling.
To analyze the
natural lip motility, it will
be is necessary to interact with the patient induring athe nonpre-operativeonal phase, in an informal and relaxed atmosphere,
observing the lip movements during a friendly and spontaneous conversation [(see
cChap.ter
1,
–
page.
..xx.)] (Figs from 1_3/-1a
to 1_3/-1d).
In
fact, dDuring the clinical phases, if patients were are asked to smile, all that
the clinician would in fact be obtained isonly an unnatural smile, due tobecause
of the natural state of tension of the
situationsion they find
themselves in. It is obvious, but important, to remember that this evaluation must be
carried out before administering the anaesthesiatic, which would completely
distort ourthe observation completely.
[End of page]
The lips should maintain move
consistently in a horizontal plane when moving and therefore be parallel to the
interpupillary line, which, it should be remembered, represents
the facial reference plane (Fig 1_3/-2).
9-–11
The lips can undergo substantial
alterations to their tonicity, which will affect their movement (Figs
1_3/-3a
and 1_3/-3b). It is not uncommon to find patients with
labial ptosis due secondary to neurological problems or, sometimes, a compensatory
psychological mechanism that allows them to hide
unattractive restorations. Regardless of the cause, any differences in
muscle tone between the right and the left sides produce a different degree of
tooth exposure, which will should be noted on the esthetic checklist. In such
cases, the lips cannot
therefore provide a reliable reference.
If parallel with the horizontal plane, the
interpupillary line will beis, all the more
reason, the most useful
parameter for determining both the incisal and occlusal planes, as well as the gingival contour.
Considerable
variation in dental exposure is can
be found between the
two arches, even in the same individual.: iIf when
during
smiling
the upper maxillary teeth are in fact
more visible, oin the
contrastry,
in many phases of speech, the lower mandibular teeth are exposed
more
(Figs from 1_3/-4a to 1_3/-4d).
This latter fact
must be duly taken into consideration if the treatment plan involves the lower
areas. When speaking of contemplating esthetics, the
tendency is to consider just the appearance of the antero-superior
sextant, and often
overlooking the important role played
by the opposing arch is overlooked [(see Cchap.ter
5, – page.
...xxx).]
[End of page]
II.
[X]Prosthetic
considerations and applications
Many subjects limit the width of their
smile to hide incongruous restorations, discolored teeth, or clinical
situations which that are notun
pleasing from thean esthetic point of view (Figs
from
1_3/-5a
to 1_3/-5c). When a pleasing appearance has been
given back to the patient, he or she will be able to smile spontaneously again,
whichin this way
can helping the perioral muscles to resume their lost
natural movement (Figs from 1_3/-5d
to 1_3/-5h). To this end, assistance can be provided
by a few specific exercises devised by Gibson,12, even if their effects do not seem to be
long lasting, but are limited only to the period
in during which they are practiced.13, 14
[End of page]
I. [A]DENTAL EXPOSURE AT REST
When the teeth are at maximum
intercuspation, the lips touch lightly and the incisal third of the upper maxillary incisors is covered by the wet surface of
the lower lip.15, 16
When
the mandible is in the rest position, the teeth do not come into contact, the
lips are slightly apart, and a portion of the incisal third of the upper
maxillary
incisors
is visible;,
this varyiesng
from 1 to 5 mm,
depending on the height of the lips and the patient’s age and sex (Figs 1_3-/6a,
1_3/-6b, 1_3/-6d, and 1_3/-6e).16, 17
Vig and Brundo16 reported that, on average, the upper maxillary incisors are exposed more in women when at
rest compared tothan
in men (3.40 mm against versus 1.91 mm), and that young patients show them much
more than middle-aged patients (3.37 mm against
versus 1.26 mm).
As some writers stress,16, 18-–20 with
age, the portion of upper maxillary incisors that is visible can in fact diminish, as the result of
both due to abrasion of the incisal margins and, more
commonly,
because of the inevitable
reduction in perioral muscle tone, which leads to greater and greater exposure
of the lower mandibular incisors (Figs
1_3-/6c,
1_3-/6f,
and 1_3/-6g).
And so it is then, that the smallest teeth in the mouth, which
are already normally
visible during speech, take on a decisive role in our patients’ esthetics, especially in older
patients.
|
DENTO
OCCLUSAL PLANE VERSUS COMMISSURAL LINE |
[End of page]
II. [X]Prosthetic
considerations and applications
“Rejuvenationg"
of
the smile is one of the requests most frequently made by patients who
haveing
to undergo prosthetic treatment (Figs 1_3/-7a
and 1_3/-7b). It is our the
clinician’s task to explain to them that, as well asin
addition to a lighter and more
attractive coloring, one of the fundamental elements for satisfying this
request is increased exposure of the upper maxillary teeth, which are
often not aso visible in older individuals due tobecause
of the biological reasons outlined above. A
dDetermination ofing how muchwhat
portion of the upper maxillary
incisors is visible
with the lips at rest constitutes one of the key parameters for evaluating
whether any alteration to tooth length is needed [(see
Table,
Cchap.ter
5,
–
page .
237xxx)] (Figs
from
1_3/-7c
to 1_3/-7i).
[End of page]
I.
[A]INCISAL EDGE
Identifying Identification
of the position of the incisal edge, in both
the apicocoronal (incisal curve), and antero-posterior directions (incisal
profile), represents a
fundamental aspect of the esthetic diagnosis. Its correct location will affect significantly affects
many of the
procedural choices that the dentist clinician and the dental technician will make in order to provide a suitable prosthetic
restoration.
.[A] INCISAL CURVE VERSUS LOWER LIP
II.
[B]CONVEX INCISAL CURVE
As
a rule, the incisal plane, when observed from the front, has a convex curve,
whichthat follows the natural
concavity of the lower lip during smilinge.
This parallelism is
seen in a high percentage of individuals, reaching as much as 85% of cases
according to a study carried out by Tjan and coworkers21, and 75% in an investigation by Owens
and associates.9, 10, 22 The curvature of the incisal plane may be
more or less accentuated. It tends to be slightly evident in dental Cclass I patients and, to flatten out considerably in cClass III subjects., while iIn cClass II patients it can be noticeably convex, where a
marked difference in length between the central and lateral incisors can be
seen. The latter of these are usually around
about
1 mm away from the
convex line described by the incisal edges of the canines and of the centrals, giving the incisal plane a
typical “gull wing” appearance.
III. [C]Radiating
symmetry
The convexity of the incisal curvature,
together with the ideal tooth proportions, produces a radiating symmetry23 which that
is more evident the
more dominant the central incisors are in relation to the laterals. Radiating
symmetry gives a pleasing smile and is normally found in young people.
The relationship between the two curves,
ideally drawn by the upper incisal margins and the lower lip, can vary from one
patient to another. In many cases a certain separation is
found between the incisal edge and the lower lip; this type of relationship is
said to be not
touching (Figs
1_3-/8a
and 1_3/-8b).
In a study carried out on the Asian
population, Dong and coworkers5 found this situation in the majority of
subjects tested (56%). In other cases, a relationship of contiguity between the
lips and teeth occurs, termed as touching (Figs 1_3-/9a
and 1_3/-9b), and is considered to be particularly pleasing from
the an esthetic standpoint. Then there are
situations where the lower lip completely covers the incisal third of the upper maxillary teeth (covering) (Figs 1_3/-10a
and 1_3/-10b). To create a harmonious smile, the
incisal margins should in any all cases maintain a parallel alignment with the lower lip.
[End of page]
II. [B]FLAT
OR REVERSE INCISAL CURVATURE
Sometimes, abrasion of the incisal edges can lead to
a flat or even a reverse incisal curvature, producing unpleasing
effects from the esthetic point of view. For
these reasons,A as well aslong
with the
decrease in tooth length being decreased, this leads to the reduction, or in some cases even the disappearance, of the interincisal angles, the
progression of which is easily seen in the natural dentition, contributing
significantly to the pleasing appearance of the smile [(see
Cchap.ter
5,
-
page… xxx)].10 This
situation usually creates leads
to a discrepancy between the incisal plane and
the curvature of the lower lip, creating a negative
anterior space (Figs from 1_3/-11a
to and
1_3/-12b).
III. [C]Horizontal
symmetry
A flat incisal plane, with uniform tooth
length and the reduction or disappearance of the interincisal angles, gives the smile horizontal symmetry. This
causes the loss of the so-called “cohesive force” in the dentofacial
composition,9, creating an unattractive esthetic effect
and an inevitable sense of an “aged” smile.
II.
[X]Prosthetic
considerations and applications
The ideal esthetic treatment involves
re-establishing a correct incisal curvature in harmony with the concavity of
the lower lip by restoring adequate tooth shape and proportion (Figs
1_3/-13a
and 1_3/-13b). An increasing number of patients wish to
rejuvenate their appearance24 in order to regain confidence and to reinforce their personality. More and more
requests are therefore made for teeth which
that are “whiter and more prominent”.” Whenever possible, we the
clinician shouldwill try to test out the new tooth lengths on
patients, either, by means of a rapid composite mock-up made in the office (Figs
1_3-/13c,
1_3/-13d,
and 1_3/-13f) or with an indirect acrylic mock-up [(see Vvolume
2, -
cChap.ter 1)] (Fig 1_3-/13e). This will is
not only be essential for esthetic previewing, but also in order to evaluate correct phonetiscis and the suitability of the anterior guide
(Figs
from
1_3/-13g
to 1_3/-13jk).
[End of page]
Nevertheless, some patients prefer to
maintain a slightly flat incisal curvature,
especially if before
treatment the incisal edges were abraded (Figs from
1_3/-14a
to 1_3/-14c).
In such cases it
will be necessary to explain to the patient that the need to create a convex
incisal curvature, apart from esthetic considerations, can also have functional
purposes, such as re-establishing an anterior guide that allows disclusion of
the posterior teeth (Figs from 1_3/-14d
to 1_3/-14j).
[End of page]
The curvature of the lower lip is not
always homogeneous. There can in fact be asymmetry between the right and the
left sides, which wethe
clinician must note each time on the esthetic checklist. Under these
circumstances we will havethe
clinician must to decide whether in ourthe treatment plan the upper maxillary incisal curvature is to follow the
anomalous line of the lower lip, or whether to maintain the parallelism between the incisal plane
and the horizontal reference plane should be
maintained (Figs
from
1_3-/15a
to 1_3/-15d). Remember that the curvature and the concavity of the lower lip constitute
a variable parameter, thatn
cannot
being ignoredable to exclude
in anticipationdvance
of
further unforeseen alterations of the lip motility. This makes means
that it is
all
theeven
more important to keep a fixed parameter such as the horizontal plane as a
stable reference to determine the incisal plane (Figs from
1_3/-15e to 1_3/-15h).
[End of page]
I. incisal [A]INCISAL
PROFILE
The incisal profile is the position of the
incisal edge in the antero-posterior direction and, as a rule, is
contained within the inner border of the lower lip [(see
cChap.ter
4,
–
page.
..
xxx.)]. This allows
adequate closure of the lips, so they can come together without any impediment interference from an incorrectly positioned third incisor of the front
teeth.25, 26
II.
[X]Prosthetic
considerations and applications
If the teeth are inclined too far forward,
this can generate a feeling of excessive tooth length
and, make closing the lips more difficult (Figs
from
1_3-/16a
to 1_3/-16c
and,
1_3/-16g). This situation can make the upper lip too
prominent and it can sometimes alter the actual morphology of the lower lip.
Repeated stimuli in the localized area may
in addition cause the formation of unwanted labial tubercles (Fig
1_3-/16d).9
Prosthetic
rehabilitation in such cases should involve modifying the incisal profile so as
to allow the anterior teeth to remain inside the vermilion border of the lower
lip
(Figs 1_3-/16e,
1_3/-16f, and
1_3/-16h).
[End of page]
I. [A]SMILE LINE
The first step in this analysis is to
evaluate the exposure of the anterior teeth during smilinge.10, 21, 27-–32 On
the basis of the amount of dental and gingival display in the antero-superior area seen in this phase, Tjan and coworkers21 has identified three types of smile lines: low, average,
and high.
II. [B]LOW
SMILE LINE
The motility of the upper lip exposes the
anterior teeth by no more than 75% (Figs 1_3-/17a
and 1_3/-17b).
II. [B]AVERAGE
SMILE LINE
Labial movement reveals 75% to 100% of the anterior teeth, as well as the interproximal gingival
papillae (Figs 1_3-/18a
and 1_3/-18b).
II. [B]HIGH
SMILE LINE
As well as the anterior teeth, which
are completely exposed
during the smile, a gingival band of varying height is also displayed (Figs
1_3-/19a
and 1_3/-19b).
A
pleasing smile can be defined as one that exposes the upper maxillary teeth completely, and along
with approximately 1 mm
of gingival tissue. Gingival exposure that does not exceed 2-
to 3
mm is nevertheless considered esthetically pleasing, while an excessive
display (>(more
than 3
mm) is generally thought considered unattractive by most
of our patients.33
Tjan and coworkers21 found in
one of his studies that 20.5% of
subjects tested showed a low smile line, while 69% had an average smile
line and only 10.5%
displayed a high smile line. The same authors21 stateds that the high smile line wais found in twice as many female subjects
compared to male subjects.
This fact wais confirmed by Owens
and associates,22, who found it repeatedly in each
of the six races they examined. A high smile line is often
correlated with particularly efficient labial muscles and/or a short upper lip.
Measuring the distance between the base of
the nose and the lower border of the upper lip (labial philtrum), Peck
and Peck34 verified that the average length is roughly 20-
to 22 mm in women and
22-
to 24 mm in men. The reduced height of the upper lip found in female subjects gives results
in a smile line that
is 1.5 mm higher on average by 1.5 mm
compared than in to male subjects.35
This accounts for the greater number of
high smile lines found in women.21, 22 Regardless of the
type of smile line the patient may possess (low, average, or high), when moving upward,s the lower edge of the upper lip may take
on a convex, flat, or concave shape in at
itsthe center. Depending on the length of the
upper lip, this gives a different amount of tooth exposure in this area each
time.5
[End of page]
The upper lip can sometimes show different
levels of exposure between the right and left sides, with resulting
in an irregular smile line (Figs
1_3/-20a
and 1_3/-20b).
The
upper lip,
too, just like the lower lip, is a structure
that changes with time and so is “unreliable” as a reference parameter. We
willClinicians should therefore use the
same criteria adopted for the lower lip:,
parallelism of the incisal plane with the horizontal reference line (the
interpupillary line), regardless of the curvature of the upper lip.21
II. [X]Prosthetic
considerations and applications
In the presence of a
high smile line, a lack of harmony in the gingival levels can induce the
clinician to resort to pre-prosthetic
surgical or orthodontic treatment to re-establish optimum symmetry and
parallelism [(see cChap.ter
6, –
pag.e …xxx)] (Figs from 1_3/-20b
to 1_3/-20f).
Furthermore, eExposure
of the gingival margins during smilinge furthermore
often obliges the dentist to hide the restorative margin inside
the gingival sulcus
(Figs from 1_3/-20g to 1_3/-20k). This choice can compromise the
biological integration of the restoration and
prove to be in vainunsuccessful if the patient does
not completely expose the teeth when smiling.36-–54
Too often, in fact, the
clinician positions the prosthetic margin is positioned subgingivally, without having first
analyzed the patient’s smile line.55, 56
If it is true, as Watson
and Crispin57 has found, that the majority of
those interviewed (73.6%) prefer not to expose the marginal limits in the
presence of a high smile line, it is also true that 87% of them would be
prepared to accept the margin positioned supragingivally if, in the case of a low smile
line, the margin would not be visible.
It should also be noted that 63.8% of patients
declare a preference for a perfect state of health, even at the cost of
esthetic appearance, if its esthetic optimization canwill put the biological integration at risk.57
However,
tThe habit of many patients of checking the
appearance of the restoration by raising the upper lip in front of the mirror
should, however, also be made knownemphasized.
It is not unusual for many of them, despite
being informed of the biological risks involved, to request in any case
that the restorativeon margin be hidden, even though they show a
low smile line. 58
[End of page]
I. [A]GUMMY
SMILEGummy
smile
The exposure of a band of gingival tissue
in excess of 3-
to 4 mm (gummy smile)
is judged by many patients to be esthetically unattractive (Figs
1_3/-21a
and 1_3/-21b).
There
are various factors whichthat, either individually or combined, can
cause this excessive visibility of the soft tissue59-–62:
§• A Sshort upper lip
§• Labial
hypermotility
§• Altered
passive tooth eruption
§• Anterior
dento-alveolar extrusion
§• Excessive vertical development of the upper
maxilla
II.
[X]Prosthetic
considerations and applications
When facedIn
treating with a gummy smile, correct diagnosis will allow
the most appropriate choice to be made in
relationwith
consideration to the etiology of
each individual casepatient.23, 62 Among the various
treatment options that can be considered with the patient, the orthognathic and
orthodontic ones treatments prove to beare
often especially
suitable, particularly where healthy teeth are involved (Figs
from
1_3/-22a
to 1_3/-22f).
[NOTE: Ref #63 is not cited.]
[End of page]
If the patient needs to be
requires prosthetically rehabilitationed, the restorative therapy will often have
to be combined with orthodontic or surgical crown lengthening procedures,64-–68, with the dual aims of both
re-establishing
ideal tooth length and reducing the amount of visible gingiva (Figs
from
1_3/-23a
to 1_3/-23g).
The cChoice
of the different treatment options must
be made while taking into due proper consideration the
following esthetic and functional parameters: